web analytics
≡ Menu

 ‘Victims’ dictate

12.06.19. Bettina Arndt attending La Trobe University as a speaker says “modern feminists” are “demonising natural male behaviours” to give people the “false idea of rape-infested university campuses”. Discussing a report by the AHRC of 30,930 students at 39 Australian universities surveyed that stated 1.6% claimed to been sexually assaulted. Arndt stood alone in the aftermath of the AHRC report in claiming it was “good news” because the full report actually showed “hardly any rape and only a lot of unwanted staring”. Some students claimed to have been harassed and menaced by threatening men multiple times during their years of study. The threat of rape is ever-present and they believe believes allowing Arndt to speak makes her campus even less safe. John Stossel discusses similar attitudes in US Universities.
“I don’t feel safe,” says a Harvard student in a video.
What threatens her? The dean of her Harvard dormitory, law professor Ronald Sullivan, agreed to be part of accused sexual harasser Harvey Weinstein’s legal defense team.
Sullivan and his wife were deans of the dormitory for years, but no matter. Now the professor is apparently an evil threat.
A group calling itself “Our Harvard Can Do Better” demanded Sullivan be removed from his dean job.
Sullivan is black, but black activists joined the protest, too. On the videotape, one says, “Dean Sullivan told me to my face that I should view his representation of Harvey Weinstein as a good thing because that representation will trickle down to black men like me who constantly face an unjust justice system.”
Seems reasonable to me. But the privileged Harvard students laugh and clap when the protester goes on to say, “F— that!”
Colleges don’t show much courage when pushed by student activists. Harvard administrators removed Sullivan and his wife from the residence hall.
Do the students really “feel unsafe”?
“They’re lying,” says Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz in my newest video. “Anybody who says they feel unsafe in the presence of a lawyer and his wife are looking you in the eye and committing the equivalent of perjury. They don’t feel unsafe. They’ve learned the language of the new McCarthyism.”
In other words, people call themselves “victims,” knowing they can get results they want by saying they are traumatized by the presence of their enemies. Schools and other businesses, wanting to avoid protracted fights and accusations of sexism, racism or “insensitivity,” rush to comply with activists’ wishes.
Dershowitz is mad about what’s happened at his school: “The mantra of the day is ‘We feel unsafe.’ Well, that’s just too bad! Learn to deal with it. You’re going to have to live in the real world in which your neighbors, friends, relatives are going to disagree with you. If you start using the criteria of ‘unsafe’ in your life, you’re going to be a failure.”
Worse, he adds, “You’re going to impose restrictions on the rest of us.”
I told Dershowitz that the students protesting Sullivan were mostly young women. Some had been sexually assaulted. Isn’t it reasonable that they not be reminded of that?
“No, it’s not reasonable not to want to face the reality that due process requires that everybody be represented,” replied Dershowitz.
Harvard didn’t fire Sullivan from his professor job, only his dean job.
So I said to Dershowitz: “Don’t students have a right to say, ‘Look, we’re living with this guy. He creeps us out because of what he does. Get somebody else’?”
“If they could say that,” replied Dershowitz, “they could say it about somebody who supports Donald Trump for president, somebody who is a Muslim, who’s gay, who’s Jewish, you name it.”
Sullivan, who like Dershowitz has defended clients considered monsters by the general public, has long argued, “For the rights of all of us… to be protected, we have to live in a system where we vigorously, vigorously defend the guilty.”
“You get the right to counsel no matter how despicable you are thought to be,” explains Dershowitz. “These students would have fired John Adams. They would have not allowed him to come to the Constitutional Convention or write the Declaration of Independence because he defended the people who were accused of the Boston Massacre.”
The new McCarthyism requires that everyone bow to demands of “victims.” That’s a lot of people.
On the videotape, one student says she worries not just about her own safety, but the well-being of “survivors, transgender and gender nonconforming people, BGLTQ people, undocumented, DACAmented and TPS people, indigenous people, first generation low-income people…”
I don’t even know what some of those words mean.
Most of us want to protect genuine victims. But it makes little sense that America, a country where even poor people live longer and better lives than almost anyone in history, has become a place where spoiled children paying $60,000 tuition consider themselves “victims.”
John Stossel is author of “No They Can’t! Why Government Fails — But Individuals Succeed.”
{ 5 comments… add one }
  • TommyGun 12/06/2019, 4:53 am

    Whining, snotty nosed kids play the “Victim Card” and the weak-as-water administrators cave in.
    Thank God for people like Arndt.

  • Albert 12/06/2019, 9:10 am

    Young women are now claiming that being stared at by a man is sexual assault. I don’t agree. Men, including myself, stare at young women because we are trying to fathom out why they are so stupid.

    • Bwana Neusi 12/06/2019, 3:32 pm

      When young women dress provocatively with uber low cut tops and split infinitive shorts, then complain that people are staring at them, they have a problem. More to the point society has a problem.

      • TommyGun 12/06/2019, 4:09 pm

        Yes; I sometimes see a young woman self-consciously tugging down at a skirt so short it is barely more than a belt and half of her ass is hanging out! Note to young lady: if you are embarrassed by half your ass being seen by others, then wear clothes that cover it! Goose.

  • Maryanne 12/06/2019, 8:51 pm

    A La Trobe academic whom I suppose could be described as a “niece-in-law” was infuriated that her husband’s aunts refused to agree with her view that women should be allowed to wear as little clothing as they like in public and after dark and expect no consequences. Yes, she’s THAT stupid.

    We explained that there’s such a word as ‘prudence’. I asked this question: “[Name], it’s a crime to steal so would you leave your wallet on the dash of your unlocked car just because theft is a crime?” She had no answer.

    My take is that they simply can’t or won’t think. They just emote.

Leave a Comment