web analytics
≡ Menu

 The AEC boffins don’t understand imagery

08.11.19. “It is hard to imagine any adult citizen being so naive and gullible to think Australia is a one-party state,” AEC solicitor James Renwick said.
It is equally hard to imagine that the AEC experts knew naught about imagery and subliminal advertising. First of all the electoral area has a sizable Chinese residency most of whom comprehend little written English. “Some of the signs, which were written in Chinese, instructed voters of “the right way to vote” and told electors to put a “1” by the Liberal candidate’s name.”  If that is not instruction for advantage, what is? But not illegal!

The  act s329:  Misleading or deceptive publications etc.
(1)  A person shall not, during the relevant period in relation to an election under this Act, print, publish or distribute, or cause, permit or authorize to be printed, published or distributed, any matter or thing that is likely to mislead or deceive an elector in relation to the casting of a vote.

Source: ABC

AEC dismisses impact of purple Chinese-language signs on election of Josh Frydenberg and Gladys Liu

The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) has told a court it is “implausible” that purple Chinese-language placards put up by the Liberal Party drastically affected the federal election result in Victoria.
“It is hard to imagine any adult citizen being so naive and gullible to think Australia is a one-party state,” AEC solicitor James Renwick said.
The Court of Disputed Returns, which is sitting in the Federal Court in Melbourne, is being asked to unseat Federal Treasurer Josh Frydenberg and his Liberal colleague Gladys Liu for allegedly using misleading signs during the May election.
The signs, known as corflutes, which resembled the purple colours used by AEC, were posted at 13 polling stations in Mr Frydenberg’s seat of Kooyong and 29 polling booths in Ms Liu’s seat of Chisholm.
Some of the signs, which were written in Chinese, instructed voters of “the right way to vote” and told electors to put a “1” by the Liberal candidate’s name.
Unsuccessful independent candidate for Kooyong, Oliver Yates, and Chisholm voter Vanessa Garbett have taken the case to court and petitioned for the results to be declared void.
But the AEC solicitor told the court in his submission that the decision to declare an election void was “drastic” and the onus was on the petitioners to prove the actions greatly affected the outcome.
“This theory put forward that there were waves of Chinese voters that came to Chisholm and Kooyong not knowing who they were going to vote for, and saw this incredible sign, which no ordinary elector could have acted on, and that they were affected or mystified … it is just an assertion and it is not enough,” Dr Renwick said.
On Wednesday, senior Victorian Liberal Party figure, Simon Frost, admitted in court that the Chinese-language signs were designed to convey the appearance of official electoral commission material.
Mr Frost, who was the party’s acting Victorian director at the time, admitted the signs did not have Liberal Party logos, and were in purple and white, the same colour scheme used by the AEC.
The lawyer representing Mr Yates and Ms Garbett, Lisa De Ferrari, argued in her submission that the corflutes were “specifically targeted”.
“Advertisers do not spend money on things that they do not think are effective,” she said.
“This is not a case of a few isolated incidents of how to vote cards. This is extensive.
“The corflutes were planned weeks in advance and targeted at specific groups.
“With knowledge that the result in Chisholm was tight.”
She said the proportion of people who speak Mandarin or Cantonese in Chisholm was 40 per cent in 2016 and 12 per cent in Kooyong.
But Mr Renwick said the use of the purple colour itself was not enough and the subset of voters which could have been targeted and swayed by the signs was not sufficient.
“[The signs] did not have an AEC logo,” he said.
“And given it was in Chinese script only, the number of people who speak Chinese, be it Mandarin of Cantonese, but no English in the home is too small to have an effect.”
Ms Liu defeated Labor’s Jennifer Yang in the seat of Chisholm by 1,090 votes on a two-party preferred basis.
One in five people in the electorate claim Chinese ancestry.
Josh Frydenberg won his seat comfortably over Greens candidate Julian Burnside, but did not win on first preferences.

{ 3 comments… add one }
  • DT 08/11/2019, 6:56 am

    Something like the 2007 federal election, in particular the Bennelong Electorate NSW where the sitting Liberal MP was Prime Minister John Howard?

    The Chinese language newspaper in Sydney published stories alleging that if the Coalition LNP Government won the election they would deport people of Asian backgrounds, and a door knocking campaign was conducted by Labor including Opposition Leader Kevin Rudd’s Chinese son in law apparently reminding Asian voters of the Coalition’s anti-Asian attitude.

  • Penguinite 08/11/2019, 7:57 am

    It might boil down to who put their sign up first? If the Libs did then it could be argued that The AEC should have taken more care with sign placement. I still want to know where Gladys found a loose $100k to top-up her campaign bank?

  • Austin Ayforti 08/11/2019, 9:07 am

    …“It is hard to imagine any adult citizen being so naive and gullible to think Australia is a one-party state,” AEC solicitor James Renwick said.
    It would not surprise me at all. I know several responsible adults who have zero interest in politics and can’t name even the PM let alone the parties involved.

Leave a Comment