web analytics
≡ Menu

 Surprise! Australia is not a big polluter as claimed

13.06.19. Oh my God! Graham Lloyd at The Australian has tipped a bucket of cold water over the heads of the bloody Greens and all the other warmistas who regularly fabricate bullshit about Australia not living up to its pollution obligations as set down mostly by those who pollute. People are waking up to the fact that all the you-beaut windmills and solar farms simply don’t cut it, but power cuts do! Countries are returning to coal. All we need now for things to get much better is go nuclear—the obvious solution to energy requirements!
Average global greenhouse gas emissions are rising at double the rate of Australia’s, exposing the mismatch between the “hope and reality” of meeting Paris Agreement goals, a report has found. A major report by energy giant BP said the world was returning to coal, and without shale gas from the US and LNG exports from Australia the emissions reduction picture would be much worse.
Source:  Environment Editor Graham Lloyd, News Corp 

Global carbon emissions rise twice as fast as ours

Massive investments in renewable energy were needed but would not be enough to satisfy ­increasing demands for power, most notably in China and India.
BP said global emissions overall were up 2 per cent last year as the unexpected return to coal gathered pace.
The increase of 600 million tonnes of greenhouse gases from energy was greater than Australia’s total output.
Officials said the report confirmed Australia’s carbon dioxide emissions were “minuscule in ­absolute terms and lower (than the world average) in percentage terms as well”.
BP said last year’s global energy demand and carbon emissions from energy use had grown at its fastest rate since 2010-11.
The BP statistical review of ­energy is a highly respected ­annual report that examines trends in energy demand and use, including from renewables.
The findings mirrored those of the recent Global Carbon Project, which reported global greenhouse gas emissions had been steadily accelerating since 2016.
Increased demand for power in China, India and the US underpinned most of the increase in ­demand. Unusually hot and cold weather led to a spike in demand for heating and cooling, notably in North America, but BP could not say if this was a one-off due to natural variation or part of a worrying climate change trend.
The report made clear that, without shale gas in America and LNG exports to Asia, notably from Australia, greenhouse gas emissions would be much higher.
Energy Minister Angus Taylor last night reiterated Australia’s contribution to lowering global carbon emissions.
“We have clearly mapped out how we will achieve the 326 million tonnes of (carbon) abatement needed to meet our 2030 Paris target — down to the last tonne,” Mr Taylor said.
Australia’s emissions from ­energy, and the energy intensity of the economy, fell in 2018, but overall carbon emissions were up 0.7 per cent due largely to industrial demand from the export LNG sector.
BP chief economist Bob Dudley said the 2018 figures showed globally there was “a growing divide between societal demands for an accelerated transition to a low carbon energy system and the ­actual pace of progress”.
The BP report said building more renewable sources of ­energy could not keep pace with rising demand.
“Even if renewables are growing at truly exceptional rates, the pace of growth of power demand, particularly in developing Asia, limits the pace at which the power sector can decarbonise,” the BP report said.
Coal production (up 4.3 per cent) and consumption (up 1.4 per cent) had increased at their fastest rate for five years.
“This strength was concentrated in Asia, with India and China together accounting for the vast majority of the gains in both consumption and production,” the BP report said.
The growth in coal demand was the second consecutive year of increases following three years of falling consumption.
“As a result, the peak in global coal consumption which many had thought had occurred in 2013 now looks less certain. Another couple of years of increases close to that seen last year would take global consumption (of coal) comfortably above 2013 levels,” the BP report said.
Mr Dudley said developments detailed in the review highlighted a critical challenge facing the global power sector.
“The shift towards greater electrification can play an important part in the energy transition only if it is accompanied by a decarbonisation of the power sector,” Mr Dudley said.
Despite the continuing rapid growth in renewable energy last year, it provided only a third of the required increase in power generation, with coal providing a broadly similar contribution.
“Decarbonising the power sector while also meeting the rapidly expanding demand for power, particularly in the developing world, is perhaps the single most important challenge facing the global energy system over the next 20 years,” Mr Dudley said.
“Renewable energy has a vital role to play in meeting that challenge. But it is unlikely to be able to do so on its own.
“A variety of different technologies and fuels are likely to be required, including extensive coal-to-gas switching and the widespread deployment of carbon capture, use and storage.
“This is not a race to renewables, it is a race to reduce carbon emissions across many fronts.”

{ 14 comments… add one }
  • luk1955 13/06/2019, 8:03 am

    Why do the “greens” never mention the much higher contribution of water vapour to “global warming/climate change”? Because all energy processes emit some amount of CO2. Now these same greens want to dump 4 million tons per year of sulfuric acid into the atmosphere in order to kill off the oceans.

  • Penguinite 13/06/2019, 8:05 am

    If you want to “switch on” switch-on to Nuclear! We have the resources but our politicians are too afraid of The Greens. Same with water. The Bradfield Scheme is on the table and viable and would go down as the real Snowy 2.0 but gutless politicians strike again.

    • C. Paul Barreira 13/06/2019, 12:00 pm

      I doubt the Australian public would permit any nuclear developments.

      Furthermore, the notion, say, of the government of South Australia managing any light water reactor is simply horrific. You’ve seen how well they maintain schools, for instance.

  • DT 13/06/2019, 9:07 am

    Man made global warming caused by carbon dioxide is a hoax.

    The transition to renewable energy and emissions reduction targets are economic vandalism.

  • Albert 13/06/2019, 9:37 am

    I have a feeling that if we could rid ourselves of the UN and find ourselves some politicians with backbone and brains then all of this nonsense would disappear.

    • DT 13/06/2019, 1:24 pm

      Very quickly I believe Albert.

      President Trump has told the UN to get out of the affairs of member nations, and that the US will not participate in the Paris Agreement emissions targeting.

    • Aktosplatz 13/06/2019, 2:16 pm

      I am bitterly disappointed that Morrison, Frydenberg, and the rest of them have turned out to be cringing cowards for evading the scam of this UN Climate Change BS and not putting their own citizens first for a change.

  • Lorraine 13/06/2019, 10:32 am

    biggest word in our language “if”

  • JK. 13/06/2019, 11:23 am

    Albert, politicians with back bones ?? They don’t exist.

  • Aktosplatz 13/06/2019, 2:08 pm

    I remember.learning that water vapour is by far the major greenhouse gas. Even everybody has experienced humidity on a hot day. That is not pollution, and CO2 has never been a pollutant either.

  • Aktosplatz 13/06/2019, 2:22 pm

    This is one of the BEST articles I have ever read on the Climate Change Scam. It’s in Quadrant Magazine, here:-


    Very well worth reading, for anyone to follow.

    • Botswana O'Hooligan 13/06/2019, 3:18 pm

      Says it all, clear and concise. Thanks mate.

    • Pensioner Pete 13/06/2019, 5:34 pm

      Great read, a simple way of understanding. Thanks Akto.

  • Deano 13/06/2019, 2:59 pm

    Thanks for the link Aktosplatz. I’ll read it in full later.

Leave a Comment