web analytics
≡ Menu

 Little by little the origin of COVID-19 surfaces!

17.09.20.  Donald Trump might have been the first world leader to directly apportion blame upon China for the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan now well known to all on planet Earth as COVID-19 pandemic. At the time it seemed his information was based on Doctor Li-Meng Yan’s scientific paper for which she had to flee Hong Kong in fear of her life and seek refuge in America where she was made welcome. It seems more will be made of this matter, which Beijing vehemently rejects when the time for compensation becomes the hot topic!
A Chinese virologist who fled her home country after studying the early outbreak of COVID-19 has published a new report that says the novel coronavirus likely originated in a laboratory. Doctor Li-Meng Yan, a scientist who studied some of the available data on COVID-19 has published her claims on Zenodo, an open access digital platform, news.com.au reports.

Source: News Corp

Virologist who fled China says virus likely came from lab

In her report she writes that she believes COVID-19 could have been “conveniently created” within a lab setting over a period of just six months, and “SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus”.
Early reports of the origin of the coronavirus, or “spillover event”, were that the virus jumped from animal to human within a wet market in the Chinese city of Wuhan sometime in late 2019.
“The natural origin theory, although widely accepted, lacks substantial support,” Dr Yan writes in the report.
“The alternative theory that the virus may have come from a research laboratory is, however, strictly censored on peer-reviewed scientific journals. Nonetheless, SARS-CoV-2 shows biological characteristics that are inconsistent with a naturally occurring, zoonotic virus.”
Dr Yan says reports that the virus originated in a wet market in Wuhan are a “smoke screen.’’
Dr Yan’s paper, ‘Unusual Features of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Suggesting Sophisticated Laboratory Modification Rather Than Natural Evolution and Delineation of Its Probable Synthetic Route’, is co-authored by three other doctors.
Dr Yan had been working at Hong Kong University’s public health laboratory sciences division, a World Health Organisation infectious diseases research centre, when her boss was asked to investigate the outbreak in Wuhan.
Dr Yan claimed her and her team’s scientific findings were suppressed, and they were told only to report cases linked to the Huanan seafood market. After becoming fearful of her safety, she fled China on a flight bound for Los Angeles in late April.
Other scientists have disputed Dr Yan’s claim, including a report from Live Science in March, which definitively claimed “SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus”.

Source: Sky News

{ 5 comments… add one }
  • Muphin 17/09/2020, 4:48 am

    Not the proper place to post this article. However, here is Alan Jones exposing the TRUTH about this alleged “pandemic”.

    https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6191311935001

  • Ozman 17/09/2020, 5:47 am

    The man to look up is Dr. Stefan Lanka. He has claimed that viruses are no more than bacteriophages for years.
    Part 1
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWO4i_6ROdc
    Part 2
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsiagDC52C0

    In 2017, the German Supreme Court appointed a Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski.

    https://www.preventdisease.com/news/17/012717_Biologist-Proves-Measles-Isnt-Virus-Wins-Supreme-Court-Case.shtml

    “Five experts have been involved in the case and presented the results of scientific studies. All five experts, including Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski who had been appointed by the OLG Stuttgart as the preceding court, have consistently found that none of the six publications which have been introduced to the trial, contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.

    In the trial, the results of research into so-called genetic fingerprints of alleged measles virus have been introduced. Two recognised laboratories, including the world’s largest and leading genetic Institute, arrived at exactly the same results independently.The results prove that the authors of the six publications in the measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today: They have misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus.”

  • luk1955 17/09/2020, 7:42 am

    I will leave you with this news item:

    The conjob19 virus relief package recently signed in law by Trump was written by Congress in 2017 with its current title of “Coronavirus 19 relief and stimulus package”.

  • Penguinite 17/09/2020, 8:19 am

    Twitter was quick to “cancel” Li-Meng Yan and doubtless Youtube won’t be far behind. No point in waiting for WHO to comment. Their superficial investigation team have already given up! After being stranded in Bejing for two weeks they went home. CCCP is never going to facillitate any meaningful inspection of Wuhan!

  • Margaret 17/09/2020, 11:09 am

    Thank you Morning Mail for posting this.

Leave a Comment