web analytics
≡ Menu

 Keating: once a younger fool, now an older fool!

28.09.20.  Australia never had such a crass, arrogant, egotist, bully like Paul Keating. True to the Labor elite trademark Mr Keating did comply. The consummate wanker in all respects, to describe the pillock kindly. Need one continue in the same manner, or has the point been made? Paul’s missus could tell you. Although, Annita Keating is too much of a lady to do that!
Paul Keating has never been one to do things by halves. He’s not satisfied with having just a chip on his shoulder; he has two. One of them is named Bob, the other is named Bernie. That’s Bob Johnston, the governor of the Reserve Bank he inherited as treasurer from the departing Fraser-Howard government in 1983.

Source: Terry McCrann, News Corp

Paul Keating stuck in the 90s with his RBA hang-ups

And Bernie Fraser, who he selected first to be his Treasury head and then in 1989 he sent to Sydney to succeed Johnston as the first — and, so far, only — governor from outside the RBA.
He blames Johnston for causing the “recession we had to have” and thereby but for John Hewson and his infamous cake would have cut his tenure as the nation’s first and only Napoleon-grade leader to barely 15 months.
He blames Fraser for “sealing the deal”, so to speak, by costing him the 1996 election and thereby succeeding in depriving the nation of that one great, Great Leader.
It was an outcome made so much worse by the fact that he was succeeded by “Little Johnnie Howard”, who he despised more than any other of his contemporaries; and who went on to get the 11-plus years in The Lodge denied him and the nation.
Indeed, he made all this all but explicit in his infamous statement during the week, lambasting the RBA in both its current and in all its past iterations.
As treasurer he’d “worn the cost of the bank’s indolence in the task of smashing inflation”. That it had been too slow in raising rates in the late 1980s and then too slow in cutting them — so thereby mandating a “recession deeper than Australia would have otherwise had”.
So, what is he telling us, that it wasn’t the recession we had to have? That it was the fault of Bob not Paul?
But how does that sit with his explicit claim, in public, in early 1989 — precisely when the RBA was hiking rates — that “they do what I say”?
As prime minister, he further claimed, he’d worn the “great political cost” of the bank’s rate rises in 1994. So again, it was then all Bernie’s fault not Paul’s.
But, again, how does that sit with his boast to a private dinner in December 1990 that he had the RBA governor — by then, Bernie — “in his pocket”: comments that were explicitly noted; and rejected; and generously excused by the same said Bernie in his departure speech as governor in 1996?
Fraser was not in his pocket — and it was explicitly Fraser not Keating who got it precisely right in raising rates in 1994.
As this paper’s Paul Kelly revealed in his The March of Patriots, Keating forced Fraser to reduce the RBA’s planned 1 per cent rate hike in August 1994 to 0.75 per cent. He would have preferred to “reduce” it away entirely, but Fraser and the then Treasury secretary, Ted Evans, held firm.
As Fraser’s statement on the rate rise phrased it at the time, it followed “deliberations by the board over several months and consultations with the government (my emphasis)”.
And who said central bankers couldn’t do subtle and droll?
Fraser and the broader deeper RBA was precisely, presciently and pre-emptively right; he followed, he had to follow, with further rises in both October and December of the full 1 percenters that had so irked Keating.
Fraser’s October statement referred to “consultations with the treasurer (my emphasis)”; his December one made no reference to consultations with anyone.
Interestingly, that “no consultations” December statement referred inquiries to a “G.R. Stevens”.
More recently known as Glenn, governor Stevens etched his place in political history, earning similar accolades of animus but from the other side of politics, by delivering the first ever rate rise in an election campaign in 2007.
When Fraser moved to hike in August 1994, inflation was about to print at a benign 1.9 per cent for the year to that September quarter.
But his focus was on pre-emption — as the RBA’s has been consistently since, whether of accelerating inflation or slowdown. By June 1995 inflation was up to 4.5 per cent and it peaked at 5.1 per cent at December 1995.
Rather than being “late to the party”, as Keating claimed, Fraser’s RBA was pre-emptively, correctly, early in 1994.
Far more importantly, those 1994 rate rises cemented and indeed created the RBA’s globally pervasive reputation as a fully independent — from political control or even persuasion — central bank, around the 2-3 per cent inflation target which was itself a creation of Fraser.
This has been a combination that has delivered real and very significant value to Australia.
The contemporary heft of Keating’s extended bleat was the RBA’s alleged failure to move aggressively to QE, or quantitative easing, by buying the bonds issued to fund the exploding budget deficit.
As our economics editor Adam Creighton pointed out, at least Keating has put histime in his basement to (good or bad) use by imbibing — indeed, swallowing whole — MMT or Modern Monetary Theory.
But in doing so he has missed, or utterly failed to understand, what the RBA hasdone this year, in playing its optimum role in responding to the government-mandated recession.
The government ordered the economy into recession; the government — actually, governments — have to order the economy out of recession.
RBA monetary policy/QE can’t do it; even fiscal policy can’t: unless and until businesses are allowed to operate; people are allowed to be employed.
The RBA has put a critically important foundation of stability under the economy and the financial system around a pervasive 0.25 per cent interest rate: that’s the (formal) cash rate; the rate at which it is printing money for the banks; the rate at which it is printing money for the government.
All of this is far more effective than the simplistic QE of other central banks and of MMT.
This is real time 2020 reality; Keating is still living, in more ways than one, in 1994.

{ 7 comments… add one }
  • Lorraine 28/09/2020, 8:03 am

    I was not a fan of Bob Hawke but I hated the Fabian Keating. what a gutter mouth he was and is still to this day. As to the mention of wife I thought she left him years ago

    • Penguinite 28/09/2020, 8:15 am

      Gutter may be a bit strong L? His bon mots and repartee was always spiteful, vindictive and, some times, very clever. Let’s face it, his targets in the Hewson mob were lily-livered w-anchors. Masturbating, malajusted Mal-contents, for the most part.

      • BBob 28/09/2020, 9:40 am

        “Gutter” is far from too strong for a POS who, in Cowards’ Castle on 11 May, 1995, said to the Leader of the Opposition Alexander Downer:

        “50 years ago your class was supporting them”, “them” being the Japanese.

        Downer’s father, and you don’t get more “of your class” than your father, endured 3 years in the hell-hole of the Changi Japanese POW camp.

  • pattoh 28/09/2020, 8:07 am

    As we hurtle into Cashless, Bail-Ins & Negative interest rates with ALL the concomitant Brig Bro Oversight; never lose sight of the fact that those guys got “their hands on the levers” through the media [ Murdoch].
    Never lose focus on the time frame & the ramping up of “Globalism”.
    Never, ever forget that those two & the “Party of the Worker” paid the price for that patronage.
    In my opinion, starting with the de-regulation of the ownership of Australia’s Banks & the floating of the $A.
    Look up who owns the big 4 now.
    I hope you feel the loss of sovereignty was worth it.
    I don’t & I feel it every ANZAC day.

  • Pensioner Pete 28/09/2020, 8:28 am

    Hawke and Keating, the dynamic duo responsible in the main, for enhancing Whitlams dream of turning Australia into a socialist nation. Hawke destroyed the craft unions, Keating destroyed our manufacturing and industry, so much damage done by so few. Let us never forget.

  • pattoh 28/09/2020, 9:54 am

    If only those dots on the wall were rivets & they were yuking it up on the Titanic………..

    Oh wait, would DanderMan be Captain Smith or the ALP Band Master?

    • Ivan Ackeroff 28/09/2020, 12:52 pm

      Pity those two weren’t sitting there when the machinegunner emptied his mag across the back wall.

Leave a Comment