web analytics
≡ Menu

 China: their infiltration is more than astounding!

24.08.20.  This expose in today’s Australian might shock many Australians who may rightly ask how and why our government allowed such a huge infiltration of China’s communist government interference in our national affairs. Watch now for China to slap down Australia with more commercial punishment. Sorry for the paragraph spacing—a technical issue with time and many images–it’s a long article!
“The Chinese government is ­actively recruiting leading Australian scientists for a secretive research program that offers lucrative salaries and perks but requires their inventions to be patented in China and obliges them to abide by Chinese law. An investigation by The Australian has revealed dozens of leading scientists at major universities across the country have been recruited to a Chinese government program called the Thousand Talents Plan, which FBI director Christopher Wray describes as economic espionage and a national security threat.”

Source: Sharri Markson and Kylar Loussikian

China exploits Australia’s lax laws to sign up researchers for secret program

Education Minister Dan Tehan, centre, with Thousand Talents recipient Dong Zhaoyang, left, and Guoxiu Wang in a picture first posted online in February.
Education Minister Dan Tehan, centre, with Thousand Talents recipient Dong Zhaoyang, left, and Guoxiu Wang in a picture first posted online in February.

The Australian’s investigation shows that, in many instances, Australian academics have been named in Chinese patent applications despite their Australian universities being unaware Academics targeted globally under the Thousand Talents Plan may have a field of research with a military application, sparking the risk the Chinese government is misusing their inventions and technology for military advancement and even to develop weapons.

When told about The Australian’s revelations, Andrew Hastie — chair of parliament’s joint ­intelligence committee — called for a parliamentary inquiry.

Mr Hastie said the revelations demonstrated how national research and intellectual property was “being plundered by the CCP”.

In many of the cases ­uncovered, universities did not know about academics’ connections to the Thousand Talents Plan and patents lodged in China prior to The Australian presenting the evidence.

UNSW said that at no time had one of its Thousand Talent Plan recipients, Dong Zhaoyang, “sold or relinquished patents to any Chinese power companies”.

When presented with evidence that Professor Dong was named in patents lodged with the National Intellectual Property Administration of China just last year, the UNSW spokeswoman said this was done “without his knowledge” and “was in line with the academic culture in China at the time”.

Alongside his salary from UNSW, his institute there has received $15m in Australian government and Australian Research Council funding. But he has also received funding from his Thousand Talents scholarship through the Chinese government’s second largest energy company, China Southern Grid. It paid for Professor Dong to hire researchers at UNSW. He also ran a research program for the company at the university. China People’s Daily stated in 2017 that Professor Dong was head of Changsha University of Science and Technology’s School of Electrical and Information Engineering and was part of the Thousand Talents Plan.

Thousand Talents Plan contracts usually legally require the copyright for any research or inventions connected with the ­program to be registered in China — irrespective of whether the ­research has been done in Australia or includes Australian funding. In return, academics receive a second salary commonly worth more than $150,000 plus lucrative research grants that can stretch into the millions from a Chinese-affiliated university.

There are a suite of other perks including education for their children, housing allowances and jobs for their spouses.

The Australian’s revelations show the widespread infiltration of Australia’s universities by the Chinese Communist Party, with almost every major institution complicit through its inaction in allowing China to be the beneficiary of its research and inventions.

The Australian can publish the names of more than 30 academics who have been recruited to the Thousand Talents Plan or another similar Chinese government recruitment program, or have registered their intellectual property in China.

In one case uncovered by The Australian, Curtin University’s Optus Chair of Artificial Intelligence, Brad Yu, who has received large amounts of Australian and US government funding, has been working at China’s Hangzhou Dianzi University.

Dianzi is designated “high-risk” for its level of Chinese military defence research. It has two major defence laboratories, five designated defence research areas and holds secret security credentials, “allowing it to undertake classified weapons and defence technology projects”.

Professor Yu specialises in drone automation and artificial intelligence, and has been working on an area of intense interest to the Chinese government: aerial warfare and co-ordinating thousands of unmanned aerial vehicles to co-operate in the air.

Chinese-language reports state he is part of Chinese government recruitment programs including the Qianjiang Scholar of Zhejiang Provincial Talent program and the Taishan Scholars Project, Shandong Province.

Despite being on full-time pay at Curtin, where he receives a 60 per cent loading on a professor’s salary and his research institute has been funded to the tune of $4m, The Australian understands he has spent most of the year in China. After The Australian contacted him and Curtin University, Professor Yu’s Hangzhou Dianzi profile became unavailable for public view.

What is the Thousand Talents Plan?
What is the Thousand Talents Plan?

The “Thousand Talents Plan” is a Chinese Government program to recruit top scientists from around the world.
It was originally designed to reverse China’s brain drain.
Under Xi Jinping’s civil-military fusion, the Thousand Talents Plan helps China achieve technological and innovation advances.
Western academics have been recruited through their colleagues, superiors or even via LinkedIn.
They are offered a lucrative second-salary, upwards of $150,000 a year, with generous research funding.
Some academics are given an entire new laboratory in a Chinese university and team of research staff.
Many are proud of their Thousand Talents link and participate with consent of their universities. Others have not disclosed the link to their universities and do not publicly admit to being part of the program.
Some Thousand Talents contracts stipulate they cannot disclose their participation in the Chinese Government program without permission.
They continue to work full-time for their Australian university while making frequent trips to China to visit the affiliated Thousand Talents Plan university.
They continue to apply for Australian Research Council grants, with no checks about where the research will end up.
Their new inventions are patented in China, often secretly.
The inventions may be commercialised, with China reaping the economic benefits.
Thousand Talents academics may be required to recruit more academics.

Curtin declined to answer specific questions about him, despite issuing a press release with great fanfare when it appointed him to the role of Optus Chair of Artificial Intelligence in May last year. “In relation to Professor Yu … we have taken, and will continue to take, steps we consider appropriate in managing their association with the university,” a Curtin spokeswoman said.

“It is not our policy to comment publicly on matters concerning individual members of staff or their employment arrangements.

“Professor Yu has spent some time in Western Australia this year, but is currently in China.”

When contacted by The Australian, Brad Yu said: “I was aware of the Thousand Talents Plan run by Chinese enthral government. Your question indicates that you have assumed/believed that I am/was a participant, but this is incorrect.” He declined to answer further questions.

University of Sydney mathematics professor Reuibin Zhang, who specialises in quantum field theory and was recruited to the Thousand Talents program in 2018, and Monash University’s associate dean until 2018, Yi-bing Cheng, a physics professor specialising in lasers, who is named in more than 20 patents filed in China assigned to universities including Wuhan University of Technology, which conducts a high level of defence research.

There’s also Professor Qiaoliang Bao, a nanotechnology specialist, who was a Thousand Talents recruit while at Monash University and is affiliated with Soochow University, assigning 24 patents to China while on the Monash payroll.

University of Western Australia professor Dongke Zhang, who has received more than $48m in funding from the Australian government and overseas industries, was recruited to the Thousand Talents Plan and is now a professor at Shanxi University and Shenyang Aerospace University, while paid as a full-time professor at UWA. Nine inventions in which he was involved have been assigned to China.

There’s also UNSW professor Jun Wang who has an official position with the People’s Republic of China’s chief administrative authority, the State Council of China, where he sits on the Expert Advisory Committee of the Overseas Chinese Affairs Office.

UNSW said his role on the State Council of China had been disclosed and “discussed with this supervisor” and he said he had never done defence or military research anywhere in the world.

The Australian is not suggesting the academics have acted inappropriately.

Rather, the CCP is taking advantage of lax universities operating in a legal and regulatory framework that does not outlaw programs such as the Thousand Talents Plan.

Investigation launched

The Australian’s investigation has exposed that universities do not know: how many Thousand Talents Plan recipients are in their employ; if their academics are lodging patents in China; and whether their academics are being paid second salaries by affiliated Chinese universities.

UTS denied one of its professors, Guoxiu Wang, was part of the Thousand Talents Plan and objected to the “sullying of the reputations of its senior researchers for their participation in formal international scholarly programs”. When asked why Professor Wang was repeatedly named as a Thousand Talents recipient on Chinese university websites, the UTS spokesman said the term was used “as a sign of respect akin to the term distinguished professor”.

When presented with the evidence that Professor Wang was named in 11 patent applications lodged in China, UTS said: “Professor Wang has no knowledge of 10 out of the 11 patent applications referenced. The 11th patent application is known to the university and results from a funded-research collaboration. Professor Wang has contacted the relevant parties to ask that his name be taken off these applications.”

The University of Queensland was also unaware one of its professors, Zhou Xiaofang, who has participated in the Thousand Talents program, was listed as an inventor on 27 patents assigned to Soochow University in China. Likewise it was unaware another Thousand Talents recipient, professor Li Ling, was the inventor on two patents filed in China with Hohai University as the applicant. And it only discovered that professor Adam Ye had been recruited to the Thousand Talents program after he left the university in 2019.

The University of Newcastle, which said none of its academics had disclosed Thousand Talents affiliations since 2016, has commenced a review after The Australian informed it that its professor Minyue Fu, a control systems and signal processing specialist, had been a Thousand Talents Plan recipient since 2010, was an academic committee member of the South China University of Technology’s autonomous systems lab and was named on about 20 patents ­assigned to Chinese universities or institutions. “We have commenced a review of these matters raised,” a spokeswoman. “This includes patents overseas, international university memberships and associated MOUs. We anticipate this review will be completed by the end of September. We take the issue of foreign interference very seriously.”

Mr Hastie said an urgent parliamentary inquiry was essential. “Our universities are sovereign institutions, funded by the Commonwealth,” he said. “These revelations demonstrate how national research and intellectual property is being plundered by the CCP. Only a parliamentary inquiry, followed by decisive action, can bring the transparency we need to protect our national interests in this sector.”

Liberal senator James Paterson said: “These are profoundly disturbing revelations. Particularly concerning is the total lack of transparency about these unorthodox arrangements. It’s time to lift the lid with a broad-ranging parliamentary inquiry into foreign interference at Australian universities.”

Signing up

Thousand Talent contracts state that the Chinese university “owns the copyrights of the works, ­inventions, patents and other ­intellectual properties produced by Party B during the Contract ­period”.

What do the academics get?
What do the academics get?

The “Thousand Talents Plan” has been described by FBI director Christopher Wray as “economic espionage”.
Some Thousand Talents academics keep their links to China secret even from their Australian universities, while others are open about their involvement.
Under “Thousand Talents Plan” contracts, scientists legally sign away the rights to their intellectual property to China.
A standard clause in the contracts states China: “owns the copyrights of the works, inventions, patents and other intellectual properties produced by Party B (the academic) during the Contract period.”
Many contracts order the scientist to observe Chinese legal system, stating the academic: “shall observe relevant laws and regulations of the People’s Republic of China and shall not interfere in China’s internal affairs.”
Australian academics are also warned about religious practices, with contracts often stating: “Party B shall respect China’s religious policies, and shall not conduct any religious activities incompatible with his/her status as a foreign expert.”
They are offered a lucrative second salary, upwards of $150,000 a year, with generous research funding.
Other perks include travel, tuition for their children and housing subsidies.
Some academics are given an entire new laboratory in a Chinese university and team of research staff to work for them.
They then have a “clone” team in China – often unbeknownst to their Australian employer.
The academic often makes numerous trips to China to conduct research.
The aim of the program is to ‘own’ the research conducted and paid for by western universities.
Another Thousand Talents contract states: “We anticipate that you will make several trips to China each year during the term of your engagement, but will perform much of your work remotely.”
China will benefit from the commercialisation: “Should Chinese scientists contribute to your discoveries in China, as we anticipate.. and our institutions will jointly own, protect and manage the commercialisation of these jointly-made discoveries.”

Some contracts even order academics to observe Chinese legal system and religious practices, saying they “shall observe relevant laws and regulations of the People’s Republic of China and shall not interfere in China’s internal affairs”. But the contracts also state that academics cannot disclose they are a Thousand Talents recipient without permission, inviting deception with their original western employer. The failure to disclose second incomes is in breach of most university conflict-of-interest policies.

Australian Strategic Policy Institute analyst Alex Joske, who released a report on Chinese talent recruitment programs last week, titled Hunting the Phoenix, said the Thousand Talents program was a major concern that needed better regulation by government and universities. “It leads to uncontrolled technology transfer to China which can lead to commercial harm, harm in terms of giving technology for military transfer to China and moral concerns, for example, concerns that technology developed with Australian funding or institutional backing could be applied to China’s surveillance state or monitoring and imprisonment of minorities and dissidents,” Mr Joske said.

Chen Yonglin, a Chinese diplomat who defected to Australia sparking diplomatic tensions in 2005, said the Thousand Talents Plan was “totally a theft” and warned that the Australian government and universities should take it more seriously.

“China is particularly interested in some world-leading fields of hi-tech in Australia such as quantum science, biotechnology, nanotechnology and new materials, superconducting materials, medical science and other advanced hi-tech,” Mr Chen said.

“Australia should halt all high-level science and technology ­collaboration with Communist China.”

He said the Thousand Talents Plan was run by all levels of the Chinese government including overseas missions, Chinese organisations affiliated to the Chinese government, and CCP United Front organisations — and they were keeping the program very quiet. “China internet search engines such as baidu.com and sohu.com, Wechat and Weibo have banned the sensitive phrase search of 1000 Talents on April 18, 2020,” Mr Chen said.

The Chinese Government has taken the program underground, censoring and wiping records of academic participation online. Mentions of the program have been erased from scientists’ CVs and censored from Chinese government websites.

Charles Sturt University public ethics academic Clive Hamilton said if there were scholars in Australia on the books of the Thousand Talents program, “then they are in effect working for the Chinese government while being paid to work at Australian universities”.

The US Department of Energy and the US National Science Foundation have banned employees from participating in the Thousand Talents Plan and other recruitment programs, while a US Senate Committee has said the program is a threat to national security. The FBI has launched criminal investigations into Thousand Talents scientists for not declaring second salaries, tax fraud and intellectual John Brown, assistant director of the FBI’s counterintelligence division, told the US Senate committee on homeland security and governmental affairs last November that through talent recruitment programs “the Chinese government offers lucrative financial and research benefits to recruit individuals working and studying outside of China who possess access to, or expertise in, high-priority research fields”.

“While mere participation in a talent plan is not illegal, investigations by the FBI and our partner agencies have revealed that participants are often incentivised to transfer to China the research they conduct in the United States, as well as other proprietary information to which they can gain access, and remain a significant threat to the United States,” Mr Brown said.

“In some cases, this has resulted in violations of US laws, including economic espionage, theft of trade secrets, and grant fraud.

In addition, many talent plan participants sign contracts outlining work that mirrors the research they perform at American institutions. These contracts subject participants to the broad laws of the Chinese government and — ironically — strictly protect China’s right to the patents and other intellectual property developed during work within the talent plan.”

In Australia, the government has no oversight on how many academics with taxpayer funded-grants have been recruited to the Thousand Talents Plan. Whereas FBI director Christopher Wray gave a July speech outlining the risks of the Thousand Talents Plan, a security source said no Australian agency was charged with investigating this issue.

A Department of Home Affairs spokeswoman said the government was working with universities after the introduction of guidelines to counter foreign interference in the sector.

“It is critical that the work of Australian researchers is not undermined by foreign interference and activities that put our universities’ people, information, intellectual property and data at risk,” the spokeswoman said.

1.Ruibin Zhang 张瑞斌, University of Sydney
2.Xiao-lin (Joshua) Zhao 赵晓林, University of NSW
3.Yi-bing Cheng 程一兵, Monash University (until 2018)
4.Xuemin Lin 林学民, University of NSW
5.Jingling Xue 薛京灵, University of NSW
6.Yanchun Zhang 张彦春, Victoria University
7.Wang Xungai 王训该, Deakin University
8.Minyue Fu 付敏跃, University of Newcastle
9.Jianfeng Nie 聂建峰, Monash University
10.Neil Foster, Curtin University
11.Dongke Zhang 张东柯, University of WA
12.Huijun Zhao 赵惠军, Griffith University
13.Wenju Cai 蔡文炬, CSIRO
14.Dai Liming 戴黎明, University of NSW
15.Zhaoyang (Joe) Dong 董朝阳, University of NSW
16.Qiaoliang Bao 鲍桥梁, Monash University (until 2019)
17.Xiao Dong Chen 陈晓东, Monash University (until 2013)
18.Min Gu 顾敏, RMIT (until 2019)
19.Li Wu 吴励, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute (until 2010)
20.Changhai Ding 丁长海, University of Tasmania
21.Qingsong (Adam) Ye 叶青松, University of Queensland (until 2020)
22.Hao Wang 王浩, University of Southern Queensland
23.Xiaofang Zhou 周晓方, University of Queensland
24.Brad Yu/ Changbin Yu 于长斌, Curtin University
25.Ling Li 李凌, University of Queensland (until 2018)
26.Yuchao Dai, Australian National University (until 2017)
27.Andrew McMinn, University of Tasmania
28.Sergey Shabala, University of Tasmania
29.Jun Wang 王军, University of NSW (applied for the Thousand Talents Plan but did not sign a contract)
30.Jianfu Chen 陈建福, La Trobe University (applied for the Thousand Talents Plan but did not sign a contract)
31.Mark Humphrey, Australian National University (applied for the Thousand Talents Plan but did not sign a contract)
32.Guoxiu Wang 汪国秀, University of Technology Sydney (denies being a Thousand Talent recruit)


{ 9 comments… add one }
  • luk1955 24/08/2020, 6:48 am

    And this is only the beginning of the chink’s deceptions. Trust an academic to fall for communism. Bastards. Just so glad my boys took my advice and did not attend or even apply to unis.

  • Steve 24/08/2020, 7:29 am

    Read Clive Hamilton’s book, Hidden Hand. All spelled out about these slimy grubs.

  • Honeybadger 24/08/2020, 8:23 am

    Thanks to Sharri and The Australian for doing what ASIO should be doing. The slack Oz Universities have let all this happen under their noses because money talks and they have no concern about the country. Chinese students means $millions, and Chinese scientists for prestige, are their priorities. All this developed technology of drones, lasers etc funded by Oz taxpayers, will be used by China against us one day. Get your investigation going Andrew Hastie and end this pillage of Australia.

  • Greg 24/08/2020, 9:23 am

    You really can’t make this stuff up. You cannot believe that taxpayers money is financing research that ends up in China. We have known about this for years (Clive Hamilton etc) but how dumb are our politicians?

  • nev 24/08/2020, 11:17 am

    The communist government owned Bank of China is an enormously powerful financial institution that not only operates like a huge bank it is also a tool of the Government for political and military purposes.
    The chairman of Bank of China back in 2011 was Tian Guoli.
    Joe Biden and John Kerry were well acquainted with the chairman Guoli and in fact during an official trip to China in 2011 while accompanied by his son Hunter, Vice President Biden had meetings with Bank of China executives.
    Ten days after the Bidens had left China it was announced that Hunter Biden’s company Rosemont Seneca and Bank of China had created an investment fund called Bohai Harvest RST (BHR). That name reflects who were involved…Bohai (Bo Hai), RS refered to Rosemount Senica and the T for Thornton Group.
    The fund was to enjoy unusual and special status in China.
    BHR Played hard and loud on its unique China/US structure that enabled it to seek investment opportunities with funds backed by the Chinese Government through a company co-owned by the sons of two of Americas most powerful decision makers.
    Biden/Kerry juniors were now able to invest billions of Chinese money into share holdings, technical ownership and overviews of the inner workings of the US Corporate body.
    It’s been going on for a long time may be if the US media and the FBI had been doing their job they would have been asking hard questions back then. But of course Cover Up Comey and his ilk saw to that and Joe and Kerry no nothing.

  • Big Al 24/08/2020, 11:39 am

    Treason, Traitors, Espionage, Fraudsters, whatever best describes their crime on the charge sheet; fling the lot to the dungeon.

  • Ozman 24/08/2020, 12:39 pm

    The chinks must be getting desperate.
    They tried to recruit me today.
    Phone call from 0451851285.
    Trump was speaking at the time, so I let them listen to him.
    Hung up on me.

  • jaded 25/08/2020, 10:39 am

    I do not for one minute believe the present Federal Govt. and State Govts along with past Governments do not know about this. The laws are lax for this reason. Oh what a tangled web they weave when they set out to deceive.

  • Doctor Pisson 25/08/2020, 1:36 pm

    If the Australian people and government are truly serious about security then there is a plausible, no argument possible, reason to insist that unis terminate the contract of any academic.
    If any academic has earned a single external dollar without receiving prior approval or has mis-represented the true worth of their external earnings then they are guilty of gross misconduct and can be dismissed immediately (it is written in every Australian academic contract).

    By the way – if we had to identify any of the above from a police line-up – fmd, no chance

Leave a Comment