web analytics
≡ Menu

Trump calls the G7 bluff.

Trump calls their bluff!

Trump refused to sign a joint statement with the other G-7 leaders Germany, France, Italy, Canada, Japan, and the United Kingdom.

We shouldn’t shed any tears because a G-7 Summit ended in failure or that Trump didn’t sign the communique. Nobody of any sense would.

You have to know what the G-7 is, after all, you know what Trump is.

The Group of Seven (G-7) is an informal bloc of industrialised democracies that meets annually to ‘discuss’ issues such as global economic governance, international security, and energy policy.

Global economic governance? International security? Energy policy?

In other words, they are a bloody cartel. A Green cartel, a syndicate, a mob, a plunderbund.

Let’s look at some of the government-knows-best language in the Communique starting with the class warfare bullshit tax policies they always begin with.

[We] support international efforts to deliver fair, progressive, effective and efficient tax systems (translated – raise taxes and soak the rich). We will continue to fight tax evasion and avoidance by promoting the global implementation of international standards and addressing base erosion and profit shifting.

Tax avoidance is what you do when you read the tax acts and set up your company or yourself to pay exactly what the tax laws allow. These masters of our destinies think we should arrange our business so as to pay the maximum tax, anyone who doesn’t is avoiding tax.

International standards is their way of stating that low-tax jurisdictions (like Trump’s vision for the US) should have to surrender their fiscal sovereignty and agree to help enforce the bad tax laws of uncompetitive nations (such as G-7 countries).

The G-7 communique also endorsed the way forward for everyone to happiness is view to give even more foreign aid and raise taxes at home to send to the ‘developing world’. Developing world refers mostly to shithouse dicator-run countries.

Public finance, including official development assistance and domestic resource mobilization, is necessary to work towards the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda.

“Sustainable development” essentially means muck and mysticism in agriculture. No fertilisers. Spotty peaches, tiddly size strawberries, twisted cucumbers.
The 2030 Agenda is the UN 2030 agenda- a woolly, vague, undefined, world government under oh-so-wonderful targets of No Poverty, Zero Hunger,Good Health and Well-Being for People, Quality Education, Gender Equality, Etc.. It is the entire reason for the global warming scam and runs in conjunction with it.

The communique recycled the myth of a big gender wage gap, even though even everyone even including the female head of Obama’s Council of Economic Advisers admitted the wage gap numbers are nonsense. They are fighting a war that was over years ago with the ‘equal pay’ movement.

AND they forgot that closing the gender wage gap is already in #5 spot in the Sustainable Agenda plan. So they put it in twice by mistake.

Our path forward will promote women’s full economic participation through working to reduce the gender wage gap.

But get this next bit! A threat that the hypocritical ideologues at the United Nations should have power over the global economy. And as if that isn’t enough they wanted a deep green policy with full on green-energy bullshit. It is as though the communique was actually designed for Trump to refuse. He walked out of the Paris Agreement – this codswallop would have brought him back in.

We reaffirm the commitment that we have made to our citizens to reduce air and water pollution and our greenhouse gas emissions to reach a global carbon-neutral economy over the course of the second half of the century. We welcome the adoption by the UN General Assembly of a resolution titled “Towards a Global Pact for the Environment” and look forward to the presentation of a report by the Secretary-General in the next General Assembly.

Carbon neutral economy?? The UN plan? Turnbull’s lunatic pursuit that is driving up our power bills??

What’s this “Global Pact for the Environment??”

By September 2018, the Secretary-General of the UN must draw up a technical and ‘evidence-based’ report to identify and evaluate any gaps in the international environmental laws and environmental instruments. In other words every nation on earth should have the same environmental laws and environmental departments – carbon taxes, windmills and solar panels, no dams. It means that local councils will insist on home building rules.*

Did they really think that Trump can’t read? The G7 envisages a world of red tape. It was set up as a counter-measure to the EU.

Since these ridiculous G’s began, there has been no growth incentives – it’s all about getting the UN to set up a global economy. A universal EU with a huge bureaucracy.

So why spend lots of money just so a bunch of politicians can have an annual publicity photo? And why give their retinues of hangers-on, grifters, hacks, and bureaucrats a taxpayer-financed annual vacation?

If Trump’s ‘protectionism’ – as it is pilloried as – leads to the disintegration of annual G-7 schmooze-fests, it will be no bad thing. If it leads to the destruction of the EU and the dismantling of the G7 I will die happy.

No wonder Trump wanted Putin to join G7. He was in it until he took over in Crimea. These two together would have the little men and women of the G7 afraid to open their mouths.

And no wonder they want to keep Putin out. Low taxes? Mein Gott!

If Trump had not walked out we would never have heard of this monstrosity. Here is part of the wording
Article 3, paragraph 1, and Article 4
Current preliminary draft of this Global Pact:
“People shall integrate the requirements of environmental protection into the planning and implementation of their policies and national and international activities, especially in order to promote the fight against climate change, the protection of oceans and the maintenance of biodiversity”; “Intergenerational equity shall guide decisions that may have an impact on the environment. Present generations shall ensure that their decisions and actions do not compromise the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

This is not a joke. This is the sort of bilge that will be presented to Australia.

{ 16 comments… add one }
  • TommyGun 15/06/2018, 5:26 am

    If these Commie poofter bastards were even half-serious about their “environmental protection” and “maintenance of biodiversity” then the first thing they’d do is admit that the shithole countries of the world should bring their breeding under control. Preferably by forced sterilisation. That, by itself, would save a lot of biodiversity (from being eaten) and a lot of environment (from being trashed).
    The rest should be a doddle.

    • Pensioner Pete 15/06/2018, 6:35 am

      TG: You are quite correct in that the current world population being around 7.6 Billion is not sustainable. I reckon nature will take care of itself, and in the not too distant future, disease will ravage the larger concentrations of population as it tends to do.

      • Zoltan 15/06/2018, 7:28 am

        That’s Victoria buggered then

      • Jack Richards 15/06/2018, 10:13 am

        Let’s hope so.

    • Cliff 15/06/2018, 10:20 am

      Tommy, you’ve just committed the inexcusable crime – you’ve mentioned the elephant that has occupied an increasingly large part of the room ever since Bob Geldof’s ‘Live Aid’ to Ethiopia. The population of Ethiopia has TREBLED since that ‘famine’, because when you fill the bellies of starving Africans, they make babies. Lots of babies, to the point where the populations of many of these countries has expanded past the point where they could be sustained without Western aid.

      So now they’re spilling into Europe, where they’re merrily going about making babies… all too often with unwilling female European partners.

      • Popular Front 15/06/2018, 12:30 pm

        Why do you think that every time there’s an African famine the West goes into hand-wringing meltdown and starts clamouring to send aid – usually ending up being stolen – but the local and neighbouring Africans shrug their shoulders and go ‘meh’? Because they’ve been used to it since the beginning of agriculture on that continent. The rains fail or the crops fail or both and people begin to starve; the strongest survive and the weakest perish and that’s the way it has always been. Our interventions may help some but it can’t help all. Africans know all this which is why they don’t GAF.

  • Graham Richards 15/06/2018, 6:44 am

    If Russia must give up Crimea, then Britain must give Gibraltar back to Spain.
    Simples. So I guess that won’t be happening!
    I ask again, how many secret agreements, unknown to the electorate, have australian governments signed up to with the UN & other organisations like The G7 or the G20.ask the stick insect, she (can I say that) appears to be overly fond of the UN & such organisations that require large & regular $$ donations preferably over a & a hundred million reach time!

    • Doug 15/06/2018, 4:17 pm

      And the Falkland islands to Argentina.

    • AnitaHaircut 15/06/2018, 7:51 pm

      Great Britain have a nerve excluding Russia because of Crimea when the irish have been fighting a war in Ireland since 1916 to make them leave. They gave up 27 counties, then later another three leaving them with six. And the Irish keep saying to go home.

  • Lorraine 15/06/2018, 6:46 am

    The leaders the G7 what a bunch of lefties and their Soros agenda. Thanks to Donald J Trump ,what we suspected, we now know.
    And a big Thankyou to Trump he reads it calls it trash , and will not sign….love that man

    • Joe Blogs 15/06/2018, 10:20 am

      He’s a beacon of sanity in a world of stupidity.

  • Phillip 15/06/2018, 7:11 am

    If they were serious about the environment they would ban all aeroplanes.

  • Popular Front 15/06/2018, 8:36 am

    There’s that bloody word ‘progressive’ again. Whenever I read that I know there’s some kind of pseudo-marxism in the works. ‘Diversity’ is another.

    • TommyGun 15/06/2018, 1:52 pm

      Don’t forget “transitioning”…..

  • Clarion Call 15/06/2018, 1:43 pm

    The communist-backed Greens and associated far-left groups decided to adopt carefully selected words to sway public opinion their way after East Germany merged with the west. They realised that words were powerful instruments in any propaganda policy. Gay, Progressives, Diversity, Transgenderism, Climate Change, etc. are all terms used by the Greens to the point of saturation….and annoyance. Won’t change until the right decides to fight back in the real sense of the word. Then pigs might fly.

Leave a Comment

Next post:

Previous post: