web analytics
≡ Menu

Why Greens deserve last place on every ballot

Why Greens deserve last place on every ballot

Purge the social cancer!

The world has for too long been conned by Green camouflage. The morning after a federal election years ago I said to an acquaintance, “how did you go yesterday?” “I voted Greens,” she said. WHAT? “Don’t you want clean air and fresh water,” she asked. Therein lies the lies. Jennifer Oriel writing in The Australian gets a sure hole-in-one with this article. It’s fridge door material.

Jihadis couldn’t take down Jim Molan in Iraq. Indonesian militants couldn’t knock him off in Timor. But the wee men of the Australian Greens think they’re in with a chance. It is little wonder they labour under such delusions. The Greens’ grand strategy reads like a Miss Universe cue card: world peace, green dreaming and love sweet love. Scratch the surface and you find nothing but fatal contradictions. For each Greens policy, there is another that cancels it out. In the end, there is nothing left.

Source: News Corp

Greens turn against Jim Molan to promote Islamist cause

The major contribution the Greens make to Australian life is to fragment politics by vulgarising manners and creating a culture hostile to the free world. The ­attack on Senator Molan is a case in point. Greens MP Adam Bandt said last week that if an inquiry into the Iraq war were held, “you would find Jim Molan would probably be up for prosecution … for his role in the atrocities in Fallujah”. It took a threat of legal action for him to apologise. His first effort sounded so insincere he had to try again before the apology was accepted.

The Greens often campaign against patriotism. They turn on their fellow countrymen to defend Islamist causes. Molan served as chief of operations in Iraq during the second battle for Fallujah. A few months before, Time magazine published an in-depth article on the “new jihad” in the region. The jihadi insurgency was led by fundamentalists keen to capitalise on regional instability. Michael Ware revealed their plan to transform Iraq into “a training ground for young jihadists who will form the next wave of recruits for al-Qa’ida and like-minded groups”. Almost all of the jihadi groups claimed inspiration from the chief of al-Qa’ida in Iraq, Abu Mousab al-Zarqawi. After he was killed by a coalition strike in 2006, Zarqawi’s men formed Islamic State.

It would be quite reasonable to form the view that the Greens have an unproductive attachment to Islamism, especially the Sunni variety. But give them some credit for consistency. They contend the 2004 battle to stop jihadis in Iraq constitutes a war crime and they protested against Western troops trying to stop Islamic State genocide in Iraq a decade later.

The problem isn’t that Molan went too far in Fallujah. The problem is that the West didn’t go far enough. The only solution to genocidal jihad is scorched earth.

When the Greens aren’t backing jihad abroad, they’re waving it ashore. Their immigration plan ­includes empowering refugees given adverse security assessments by ASIO to challenge the findings. Last year, the government reported that 500 refugees from Iraq and Syria were denied entry after the Five Eyes intelligence alliance warned their names were on international security lists.

Dozens had adverse national security assessments.

When not defending the rights of terrorists against the welfare of free world citizens, the Greens are busy contradicting themselves. There is perhaps no more contradictory policy than pushing big ­immigration via porous borders while complaining about resource scarcity. If what the Greens say is true and Australia is running down its supply of natural resources, then promoting population growth by increasing the immigration intake is self-defeating.

The Australian Greens form part of the international alliance, Global Greens. Its charter opens with the odd idea that we are “citizens of the planet” — as though the planet were a nation state. The Global Greens believe “the environment ignores borders between countries”. The environment is not a human being. It can neither ignore nor recognise ­nation state borders. But the Global Greens want a world without borders. At the same time, they claim to support “participatory democracy” in which “all citizens have the right to express their views”.

A world without borders — the global government envisioned by greens parties — would destroy liberal democracy. The free world constitutes a minority of states and a relatively small percentage of the world’s population. In the global political system envisioned by greens parties, most votes would be cast by members of Islamist and communist states. Totalitarianism would spread its tentacles across the globe.

Despite the totalitarian threat, European greens tried to introduce a system for transnational members of parliament in next year’s European elections. The vote for transnational lists was defeated 368 to 274 last week.

In the context of a global parliament, it would make sense for politicians to appeal to Islamists and communists/socialists, given they would constitute most voters. Such a political system is not possible unless nation states cease to exist. Liberal democratic nations pose a significant problem for supranationalists because they demonstrate the nation state system can generate prosperity, security and stability for its citizens.

Greens parties protest against national security in favour of “a comprehensive concept of global security”. The Global Greens’ world security requires “a global security system capable of the prevention, management and resolution of conflicts”. But who would direct the leviathan? The greens nominate the “United Nations as the global organisation of conflict management”.
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres could be amenable to the idea. As president of Socialist International, Guterres proposed a global government governed by a UN parliamentary assembly.

The Australian Labor Party quit Socialist International for a more moderate European alliance. But greens parties have taken up the red flag to promote a global revolution that would devastate freedom and concentrate power in a world of tyranny without borders.
Jennifer Oriel
Dr Jennifer Oriel is a columnist with a PhD in political science. She writes a weekly column in The Australian. Dr Oriel’s academic work has been featured on the syllabi of Harvard University, the University of London, the University of Toronto, Amherst College, the University of Wisconsin and Columbia University. She has been cited by a broad range of organisations including the World Health Organisation and the United Nations Economic Commission of Africa.

{ 21 comments… add one }
  • luk1955 12/02/2018, 6:32 am

    The greens get their money from the elite, who are using the greens to destroy our civilisation. They are even more communist than the Russians and Chinese were at their peak.

  • Cliff 12/02/2018, 7:02 am

    I have young relatives, the progeny of your classic ABC-watching, inner city, latte-sipping ‘elites’, who really need to read Jennifer Oriel’s article in full. (As do their parents.) But they never will – (the young ones nor their parents) – and I don’t dare to try to make them do so.

    We have already had a major falling-out with one branch of the family (so major, I strongly suspect it is irredeemable and therefore permanent), over Uncle Cliff’s ‘attitude’ to politics and world events since the emergence of Donald Trump. They even suggested (not to me, but to my wife) – and SO sympathetically – that I might have mental health ‘issues’ requiring treatment, because anyone who does not agree with their Leftie view of life is quite obviously mentally deficient.

    So if I was to send Jennifer Oriel’s article on my young neices and nephews, all I would achieve is to risk further shrinking our family circle.

    There are two Australias out there, and they are growing further and further apart, to the point where it is beginning to worry me about how it can continue.

    • Bob 12/02/2018, 7:45 am

      Looks like it you are not the only one Cliff, I have a similar problem with mine , have to admit they have to live with their decisions I suppose in years to come , no point in convincing them to think otherwise or at least listen , I am used being called everything under the horizon , did it bother me nah…

    • Pensioner Pete 12/02/2018, 8:23 am

      I joined the ranks of the ‘scorned’ last year when a close rellie who lives in Melbourne of the latte and chardonnay ilk – Labor/Greens rusted on, became irrational about my views of Trump, the Abo’s and Moslems including how dare I question the ABC’s views. I continue to sleep well at night, whilst I suspect, she who is eternally offended, does not sleep well at all. I don’t expect a call from her for many years, if ever again. An excellent outcome really.

      • Bushkid 12/02/2018, 9:28 am

        Yep, the apparent inability to accept that anyone can have a different point of view or understanding of the world and reality is the most concerning thing for me.

        The “how dare you question” attitude, be it the ABC or the greenslime or “tolerance” or “lurve is lurve” or unlimited immigration/invasion or the UN and its “wisdom” etc, is the real tell. When a person refuses you the right to disagree with them, or to hold a differing opinion or understanding, then you know they’re a totalitarian at heart, and – when in numbers – become a very real danger to the rest of us. We laughingly call them “control freaks”, but they’re actually totalitarians.

    • Bushkid 12/02/2018, 9:21 am

      Sadly, it’s even more difficult to maintain respected for a spouse who has been captured by the ALPBCs anti-everything-Trump rubbish. I do quietly inject common sense ripostes into the conversation, and occasionally they do seem to give him pause for thought, and slow his rants and ridicule, but it seems I’m in for the long haul. It’s even more galling when I know he’s been trained to assess his sources and rate their reliability more carefully than this. He condemns the ABC for it’s unrelenting leftism and misrepresentation, yet blindly follows their script the moment Trump is mentioned.

      The really frustrating thing though, is that he cheered out loud when Hillary was defeated, and Trump won. He’s smart enough to know we dodged a big bullet there, yet refuses to see anything at all remotely good in PDT. It doesn’t help that his pro-union, leftie, scornful, also rabidly anti-Trump brother has been staying for an extended period, and eggs him on.

      Fortunately I don’t have to battle on the gerbil worming front, he’s a lot smarter than that, thank goodness.

    • Penguinite 12/02/2018, 9:39 am

      Cliff, looks like your respondents have unearthed some latent Greenery. I say just keep spruiking the common sense. Some autumnal pruning should do the trick!. Now we know why Labor and frustratingly of late the Liberals have been courting teachers et al! The Libs need a good shake-up and to be cleansed of the win at all costs mentality! We also know that Malcontent bought his position with a $1.3 million donation tax deduction! He is one hell of a slimy sod!

    • Botswana O'Hooligan 12/02/2018, 11:44 am

      Same here Cliff, with one exception the kids from a former marriage tolerate me because our politics differ because they are either green or labor and all highly educated from my pocket, one hasn’t spoken to me for ten years or so, and yet my Ruski family hold the same basic ideals as many of us do, ordinary conservative ones.

    • luk1955 13/02/2018, 6:23 pm

      But hey Cliff, our governments are united. United in that Australia must not continue as a free country but must be a communist and totalitarian slave state, for us that is, but not them. The red governments want to own it ALL!

  • Joe Blogs 12/02/2018, 7:10 am

    “wee men” = pissants.
    “Australian Greens” = un-Australian commos.

  • TommyGun 12/02/2018, 8:14 am

    I have a sister who was blinded by the Green ideology. She even handed out “How to Vote” cards for them. But she eventually saw the light. Last time she voted One Nation!! (Now that’s a turn-around!) So there is hope….

    • Pensioner Pete 12/02/2018, 8:25 am

      TG: There is hope indeed, good news, I hope this spreads like oil on water.

  • Lorraine 12/02/2018, 9:05 am

    The big lie is in the Name. The Greens, people think environmental ,like clean this and that. the naming to The Browns would be nearer to the truth, I think it was the brown shirts of the German Army that did major crimes against humanity. The Greens are in a sewer of their own, and the Brown and green bile is nectar to them , they are criminals to our political system. The mantra must be put the Greens last, the voter has the ability to wipe them from the face of the earth

    • Penguinite 12/02/2018, 9:47 am

      My belief is that most Greenies are latent communists who vote Green because the Labor to too centrified. Labor, of course love this predicament because they know that most Green preferences will flow to them. Batman will be a real test! Nevertheless, it’s sad fact that at least 10% of Australians are so confused!

      • Lorraine 12/02/2018, 9:53 am

        it will be more than 10% in Batman if the Greens win, confused or just stupid .

      • Tom 12/02/2018, 10:41 am

        I’m afraid Lorraine is right. Brandt, even after his second faux apology, is still a total hero in the sidewalk cafes of Batman. They all KNOW he didn’t mean a word of either apology and that he made both apologies only because his legal advisors told him he must do so to be able to continue his ‘good work’.

        I often find myself wondering what those who vote Green think will become of them in the world they are so earnestly wishing for. There is only one certainty – a certainly that seems to be lost on every one of them – there will be no place for people like them, except in some Central Australian desert Gulag.

    • Botswana O'Hooligan 12/02/2018, 11:50 am

      L, I watch a program on SBS about Nazi Germany at 1730 each Sunday. They seem to run in batches for the SBS does stuff without rhyme or reason. The current series is about the rise of Hitler and of course my Ruski born missus won’t watch anything to do with Germany and WW2. I convinced her to watch a bit last evening and her comment was, Stalin used those tactics in Russia and now I can see that all these green, labor, and abo protesters, are gradually doing the same here in Australia so we should be out there protesting against them before it is too late.

      • Neville 13/02/2018, 3:51 am

        And yet, BO’H, people won’t protest. They’ve been generally brainwashed by the disciples of Gramsci, and don’t KNOW any different.

  • Graham 12/02/2018, 11:59 am

    Di Natale and Brandt, 2 vertically challenged contemptuous weeds who need a good dose of Roundup.

  • Aktosplatz 12/02/2018, 7:15 pm

    The term “Gang-Green” first appeared on Piers Akerman’s blog a few years ago as a response to Gillard’s ( then) pact with the Greens.

    And of course, the other suitable label was, and is, “Watermelon” denoting the green on the outside and red on the inside.

    ‘Red’ of course is their true colour.

    • Neville 13/02/2018, 3:52 am

      I’m not sure, but I think it was Delingpole who coined the “watermelons” moniker.

Leave a Comment